Yosi,
Thanks for the reply. With the holidays, I am a little
slow getting through the mail.
Normally, I believe this would be true. Unfortunately,
they werent giving us a deal on the licenses at all.
In fact we will probably be able to buy the license
ourselves for much less (once the discount is taken).
There just are no pluses to doing it for this project.
I'm glad management kept the options open.
Larry
- Yosi_at_comhill.com wrote:
> If a vendor is an Oracle Partner (we were, but we
> let it expire)
> they get to resell Oracle licenses and make a good
> profit - or
> sell it at close to their cost. This helps them sell
> their app.
>
> As Steve mentioned, the upside is that you get
> Oracle for as low
> as halfprice. The downside is obviously the support
> problem. That's
> probably how they afford to sell the db so cheap.
>
> Oracle does not provide a way for people who buy
> apps from partners
> to buy support directly. They should.
>
> Yosi
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dgoulet_at_vicr.com [mailto:dgoulet_at_vicr.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 11:11 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: Re:RE: Contract wording
> >
> >
> > I'll agree with Steve wholeheartedly. We had a
> relationship
> > with a vendor where
> > they mandated that they provide an interface to
> Oracle to
> > "save us the hassles
> > with OWS". Well, as it turned out they were a
> VERY small
> > company, which has
> > since gone the way of the DODO bird. Their 5
> people were all
> > VB developers with
> > absolutely no real experience with Oracle. They
> had
> > installed in VIA the
> > installer onto an NT system & that was all. If it
> broke they
> > just re-installed.
> > Needless to say when the first issue occurred
> they took
> > forever to "get an
> > answer from Oracle". So long in fact that I had
> already
> > called Oracle, using
> > another CSI mind you, gotten the answer and was
> waiting with
> > baited breath for
> > their response. When they finally called, one
> month later &
> > after 45 or so
> > follow-up calls, I had a pile of fun. So in a way
> I guess
> > having that type of
> > relationship with your vendor is rewarding.
> Certainly gave
> > me a chance t0
> > "unload"!!!
> >
> > Dick Goulet
> >
> > ____________________Reply
> Separator____________________
> > Author: "Steve Orr" <sorr_at_arzoo.com>
> > Date: 12/20/2000 4:10 PM
> >
> > I had something like that once. It was a "limited
> use"
> > contract meaning that
> > we could only use the database for the 3rd party
> vendor's
> > app. It was a full
> > function database at a much reduced cost but we
> could not
> > legally add other
> > apps or develop our own apps under that license.
> It was a
> > real hassle for
> > pure Oracle support issues having a middle man.
> They weren't
> > used to dealing
> > with a real life DBA and sometimes they were
> trying to get answers to
> > questions they couldn't even understand :-(
> Sometimes they
> > would give me
> > direct contact with OWS using a special access
> code with their CSI#.
> > Eventually we were able to pay a reduced amount to
> the 3rd
> > party vendor for
> > only supporting their app along with a separate
> support
> > contract directly
> > with Oracle. For awhile, we had 2 Oracle licenses,
> one cheap
> > limited use
> > license on the big production server with the 3rd
> party, and
> > another more
> > expensive license directly with Oracle on a
> smaller
> > development machine.
> > Since we had a copy of the app on the small
> development
> > machine we could
> > also get direct Oracle support under that CSI.
> Maybe your 3rd
> > party vender
> > is better but based on my past experience, I'd
> recommend that you do
> > whatever you can to get support directly from OWS.
> >
> > Good Luck,
> > Steve Orr
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 8:39 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> >
> > Dear List,
> >
> > We are about to purchase an application that uses
> > Oracle. For various reasons, we will be purchasing
> the
> > Oracle licenses from the vendor instead of Oracle
> > themselves. We will also be buying Oracle support
> > through the vendor, which in the language of the
> > vendor, means that they want to be the middle man
> > between us and Oracle for support calls. I want
> the
> > option of going through the vendor or directly to
> > Oracle to avoid this extra layer of
> > (mis)communication.
> >
> > This being our first encounter with this type of
> > setup, I was wondering if anyone had language that
> > they use in a contract that addresses this
> situation.
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Larry Hahn
> > DBA
> > Journal Sentinel, Inc.
> > Milwaukee, Wi 53203
> >
> > Author: Larry Hahn
> > INET: lhahn_60_at_yahoo.com
> >
> > --
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.com
> > --
> > Author: Steve Orr
> > INET: sorr_at_arzoo.com
> >
> > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051
> FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California -- Public Internet
> access / Mailing Lists
> >
>
> > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
> E-Mail message
> > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of
> 'ListGuru') and in
> > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L
> > (or the name of mailing list you want to be
> removed from). You may
> > also send the HELP command for other information
> (like subscribing).
> > --
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.com
> > --
> > Author:
> > INET: dgoulet_at_vicr.com
> >
> > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051
> FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California -- Public Internet
> access / Mailing Lists
> >
>
> > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
> E-Mail message
> > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of
> 'ListGuru') and in
> > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L
> > (or the name of mailing list you want to be
Received on Fri Dec 29 2000 - 15:13:33 CST
