Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Locally managed tablespaces

RE: Locally managed tablespaces

From: Steve Adams <steve.adams_at_ixora.com.au>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 05:55:49 +1000
Message-Id: <10668.120998@fatcity.com>


Hi Terry,

It was the same with a MINIMUM EXTENT size specification under 8.0. These data dictionary views show what you asked for; only DBA_EXTENTS shows what you really got.

@ Regards,
@ Steve Adams
@ http://www.ixora.com.au/
@ http://www.christianity.net.au/

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Ball [mailto:terry_ball_at_csgsystems.com] Sent: Friday, 3 November 2000 1:00
To: oracle list; oracledba
Subject: Locally managed tablespaces

We are currently on an AIX RS6000 box using Oracle 8.1.6.

I created a locally managed tablespace (to be used for indexes). I then issued an alter index rebuild command specifying the new tablespace as the destination (without using a storage clause). The rebuild went OK, but when I checked the initial and next for the index (in dba_indexes and dba_segments) it shows it as having an initial extent the same as it was before the move. Looking in dba_extents, all extents associated with the index are the correct size.

Why does dba_segments and dba_indexes show an incorrect initial extens? Is it necessary to specify the storage clause to see the correct initial extent?

Terry



Think you know someone who can answer the above question? Forward it to them! to unsubscribe, send a blank email to oracledba-unsubscribe_at_LAZYDBA.com to subscribe send a blank email to oracledba-subscribe_at_LAZYDBA.com Received on Thu Nov 02 2000 - 13:55:49 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US