Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RMAN backup issue

RE: RMAN backup issue

From: Rama Malladi <rmalladi_at_inteliant.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 15:32:45 -0800
Message-Id: <10668.121015@fatcity.com>


Tom,
 Thanks for your mail. As I mentioned in my mail, After having a long meeting, our team decided that to be on the safe side, it is good to have both Full and Level0 on day1. We restored successfully several times after that. But as you said it might have been redundant. Team decision at that time was, it was okay to be on the safe side, even if it meant being foolish!

 Coming to your questions...

Thanks for your feedback
Rama


-----Original Message-----
From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Tom Tyson Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 5:46 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: RMAN backup issue

Just wanted to add my .02 cents...

The only difference between a full backup and a incremental (differential / cummulative) backup is that one is consistent and the other is not. Another difference is that the full backup causes every used block to get backed up, but not unused blocks. But you only need to apply archive log files to your iconsistent database... Other than that, you can recover just as well. I have
had clients running for months with only Level 0's and 1's using a incremental
cummultative backups with no problems. I've had to perform db restores, and had no problems recovering any part of the database. A couple of questions on
your scripts..

Anyway.. just thought I'd pipe in.. no offense meant..

Tom Tyson

Received on Thu Nov 02 2000 - 17:32:45 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US