Re: df -k confusion

Philippe!

You are right, u can avoid giving this 10% space to system (kernel) for un-moutable file systems. Those file systems which are not un-mountable like / or /var, u cannot use that reserved 10% space b'coz system will not let u change this.

Jakh

DEVERGE Philippe wrote:

> *********************************************************
>
> noname is scanned and no virus found (American University of Sharjah - Network Section)
> *********************************************************
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi,
> Yes it is due to the system management there is by default always
> 10% not allowed on a filesystem.
> and when your filesystem is 100% full, your system do not crash and
> your SA can access to the filesystem.
>
> I do not remember the command to resize this percentage. On non
> critical filesystem like where database
> files are located you can set this percentage less than than 10% (1%) and
> gain some place to increase the datafile.
>
> Regards
> PHD
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De: Rajesh Dayal [SMTP:Rajesh_at_ohitelecom.com]
> > Date: lundi 16 octobre 2000 16:26
> > À: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Objet: df -k confusion
> >
> > Dear All,
> > Although this is not a Oracle Question, but I hope some-one
> > would clarify this.
> > When I do df -k on of my one of my client's system
> > (DEC Alpha 4100, 4.0 F ) , the result is as follows:
> >
> > # df -k
> > Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
> > /dev/rz9a 257759 107568 124415 47% /
> > /proc 0 0 0 100% /proc
> > /dev/rz9g 1247782 548630 574373 49% /usr
> > /dev/rz10a 1524822 428791 943548 32% /oracle
> > /dev/rz10g 2537116 2015704 267700 89% /data
> > /dev/rz11a 99151 51252 37983 58% /u01
> > /dev/rz11d 744551 579251 90844 87% /u02
> > /dev/rz11e 2033598 1434467 395771 79% /u03
> > /dev/rz11f 1016791 368988 546123 41% /u04
> > /dev/rz11g 2033598 1562492 267746 86% /u05
> > /dev/rz11h 2033598 1347940 482298 74% /u06
> >
> > The problem is that the sum of used and available blocks don't
> > match
> > with total no of Blocks. They are always less by app. 10% from the total
> > no of
> > blocks. Is there any specific reason for this???
> >
> > TIA,
> > Rajesh
> >
> > --
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > --
> > Author: Rajesh Dayal
> > INET: Rajesh_at_ohitelecom.com
> >
> > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: DEVERGE Philippe
> INET: Philippe.DEVERGE_at_opt.nc
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
Received on Mon Oct 16 2000 - 00:28:38 CDT