Message-Id: <10638.118396@fatcity.com> From: Satar Naghshineh Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:45:14 -0700 Subject: RE: Oracle on NT vs Oracle on Linux This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C02D72.75CDDB70 Content-Type: text/plain www.unix-vs-nt.org the kirch paper Linux is better because it's free and they provide the source code. Regards, Satar > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrey Bronfin [SMTP:bronfin@navixo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 6:27 PM > To: ORACLE-L@lists.sunysb.edu; ORACLE-L@fatcity.com; > oracledba@quickdoc.co.uk > Subject: Oracle on NT vs Oracle on Linux > > Dear list ! > > A friend asked me this question : > > they want to build an Oracle DB on a server ( PC ) dedicated exclusively > for the DB . > They ask whether it is better to put a Linux or an NT on that PC . > I.e which OS is better for hosting an Oracle DB on PC ? > What are the pros & cons of each ? > They are mostly concerned about reliability & performance . > > TIA . > > > Andrey Bronfin > VisualTop.com > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C02D72.75CDDB70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Oracle on NT vs Oracle on Linux

www.unix-vs-nt.org  the kirch paper

Linux is better = because it's free and they provide the source code.

Regards,
Satar