Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: ok, no ROWID's as ID, what should i use instead? :-)

Re: ok, no ROWID's as ID, what should i use instead? :-)

From: William Beilstein <BeilstWH_at_obg.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 08:02:37 -0400
Message-Id: <10572.113247@fatcity.com>


Yes, you would use a sequence. To create it you would issue the following = command

CREATE SEQUENCE my_table_s

       START WITH 1
       INCREMENT BY 1
       NOMAXVALUE
       NOCACHE;

To use it in an insert you would

INSERT INTO my_table VALUES(my_table_s.nextval,nextvalue);

The sequence is a construct that will automatically return a guaranteed = unique value (per sequence)

>>> Dries Verachtert <dries_at_ulyssis.org> 07/28/00 05:06AM >>>

Hello,

Thanx for all the info about ROWID's. I still got the following questions: * In many examples, people use NUMBER(38,0) for every ID. Is there a certain speedup to use such large ID? For example my db has a table of winecolours with maybe 20 rows. Should i still use NUMBER(38,0) as ID because it is faster? NUMBER(38,0) seems to use 128 bits, does a number(?,?= )
always use that much bits maybe?

Thanx in advance,
Dries Verachtert

--=20
Author: Dries Verachtert
  INET: dries_at_ulyssis.org=20

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Fri Jul 28 2000 - 07:02:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US