Re: Off Topic: SQL-Backtrack

Thanks Jared and Ron for your replies. To my dismay, SQL-Backtrack doesn't know about LOG_ARCHIVE_DUPLEX_DEST, therefore doesn't remove (or rename) any duplexed archive logs. Or did I miss something ???

Suzy

Jared Still wrote:
>
> > Is there any benefit to having SQL-Backtrack keep (rename) the archive
> > logs after backup instead of deleting them?
>
> There may be a benefit if you need those logs online to fulfill SLA
> requirements, otherwise I don't see much benefit in it.
>
> >
> > After switching to archivelog mode, is a full online backup sufficient,
> > or for safety should I do a full cold backup?
> >
> > For some databases, there isn't a regular window that can be used for
> > cold backups, so only full on-line daily backups will be done. Any
> > problem with this strategy?
>
> The usual cold vs. hot backup arguments would apply. A hot backup
> should be fine. There are certain situations where a cold backup
> is necessary, such as after opening with RESETLOGS.
>
> Jared Still
> Certified Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist ;-)
> Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
> jkstill_at_bcbso.com - Work - preferred address
> jkstill_at_teleport.com - private
>
> --
> Author: Jared Still
> INET: jkstill_at_bcbso.com
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Wed Jul 12 2000 - 15:55:38 CDT