Message-Id: <10526.108733@fatcity.com> From: "Adams, Matthew (GEA, 088130)" Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 14:30:27 -0400 Subject: RE: Redo logs on mirrored disks This is one of the very FEW things I disagree with Steve on. I ALWAYS multiplex (and mirror). Mirroring alone does nothing for you if a clueless admin type removes your redo log file without know what he is removing (it's happend at other sites). > -----Original Message----- > From: rsands@lendleaserei.com [mailto:rsands@lendleaserei.com] > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 12:52 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Redo logs on mirrored disks > > > > > listers, > > Reading through Steve Adams web site, I came across > the tip that says redo logs should be mirrored or > multiplexed, but there is no need to do both. The > explanation makes sense, but I have never run a > production database without multiplexing redo logs, > and the thought of doing so is a little scary!! I > wanted to find out how many other DBA's have taken > this approach, and if you've tried it, how much of > performance difference have you seen? Is there any > increased risk of data loss? > > TIA ... Robyn Sands > > > -- > Author: > INET: rsands@lendleaserei.com > > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 > San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message > to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).