Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Questions re redo log files

RE: Questions re redo log files

From: Kevin Fries <kfries_at_lart.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:06:36 -0700
Message-Id: <10502.106152@fatcity.com>


DBV(erify) isn't meant for the redo or archive logs (or even the controlfiles). They're a different beast. They'll be marked as 'stale' if there's 4 or more errors in a log. You can find the errors in the alert logs.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Bill Wagman
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 1:01 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Questions re redo log files
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been playing around with the dbv utility and have encountered
> several questions.
>
> What are the ramifications of using the dbv utility to look at redo logs?
>
> When I created the database I specified a database block size of 8192 in
> the init.ora file and used the following statement to create the
> database...
>
> create database "isodtest"
> controlfile reuse
> maxinstances 1
> maxlogfiles 16
> maxdatafiles 30
> character set "US7ASCII"
> datafile
> '$ORACLE_LOCAL/data/isodtest/system01.dbf' size 100002K
> reuse logfile
> '$ORACLE_LOCAL/data/isodtest/log01.dbf' size 10000K reuse,
> '$ORACLE_LOCAL/data/isodtest/log02.dbf' size 10000K reuse,
> '$ORACLE_LOCAL/data/isodtest/log03.dbf' size 10000K reuse;
>
> yet when I run the dbv utility I must specify a blocksize of 512
> to look at
> the redo logs.
>
> Why is the block size of the redo log files 512? Do I need to worry about
> the fact that the blocksize is different from the rest of the files? Do I
> have any control over this at database creation time?
>
> When I do analyze the redo logs the utility returns the following
> for each
> page...
>
> DBVERIFY: Release 8.0.5.1.0 - Production on Fri May 19 11:42:33 2000
>
> (c) Copyright 1998 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
>
>
> DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = log01.dbf
> Page 1 is marked corrupt
> ***
> Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00000001 file=0. blocknum=1.
> Bad header found during dbv:
> Data in bad block - type:0. format:0. rdba:0x00000001
> last change scn:0x0000.17b90186 seq:0x47 flg:0x65
> consistancy value in tail 0x00000000
> check value in block header: 0x800, calculated check value: 0x0
> spare1:0x2f, spare2:0x59, spare2:0x0
>
> Why does it return to me that there is an error on each page?
> This does not
> happen with any of the other files. Is this anything I need to
> worry about?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bill Wagman
> Univ. of California at Davis
> Information Resources
> wjwagman_at_ucdavis.edu
> (530) 754-6208
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Why is it that when you're driving and looking for an address, you turn
> down the volume on the radio?
>
> --
> Author: Bill Wagman
> INET: wjwagman_at_ucdavis.edu
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
Received on Fri May 19 2000 - 19:06:36 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US