| Burleson? [message #404104] |
Wed, 20 May 2009 07:03  |
 |
Littlefoot
Messages: 21823
Registered: June 2005
Location: Croatia, Europe
|
Senior Member
Account Moderator |
|
|
It has been suggested (here) that "-burleson" is even more important than using "oracle" when googling for Oracle-related information. Occasionally, I see similar notes on other sites.
So what's wrong with Burleson? Why him? There are many worse Oracle sites/blogs/whatever than his, but noone mentions these (or, at least, I didn't notice that).
|
|
|
|
| Re: Burleson? [message #404118 is a reply to message #404104] |
Wed, 20 May 2009 07:56  |
cookiemonster
Messages: 13960
Registered: September 2008
Location: Rainy Manchester
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Mr Burleson and some of his friends got into a few protracted discussions/arguments with Tom Kyte a while back about the importance of evidence for performance tuning.
Unsurprisingly Tom won.
Go to asktom and stick Burleson in the search field if you want to take a look.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Burleson? [message #404364 is a reply to message #404246] |
Thu, 21 May 2009 08:49 |
 |
Mahesh Rajendran
Messages: 10708
Registered: March 2002
Location: oracleDocoVille
|
Senior Member
Account Moderator |
|
|
I love those days ( BB Vs TK, w.r.to technical conversations only).
Needless to say, BB is still the star entertainer among Oracle groupies.
What I really miss is the good old days at C.D.O.S with all the
healthy, heated and very opinionated conversations with atomic details on Oracle.
[Updated on: Thu, 21 May 2009 08:52] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
] 
Blog
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
